Yes.
As of today we are in string freeze for the next darktable version. Version 1.1 will not only contain bug fixes (that too) but a lot of new features. Some of them long-wanted, some of them you haven’t even dreamed about.
As usual we follow our release procedure:
- String freeze (as of now). Translators get time to catch up and it’s a good means to stop overly crazy development to be merged into master
- A couple of weeks of translating and bug hunting
- Then we’ll release release candidates again, to enable bread testing even from users who aren’t comfortable with “unstable” packages or git.
- … and finally there will be a new stable version of darktable.
Please help us to make this release another success, translate if there is something to translate, test, find bugs and report them to our bug tracker. If you have any questions, join us on IRC or the mailing lists.
Thank you
I am really looking forward v1.1 !
I'm so impatient that I tried out the unstable repos (I was previously using 1.3). I must say that except for the black squares everywhere in the preview, I really liked what I saw so far (and still no crash after prost-processing half a dozen HDR files coming from Luminance)
What I liked :
- Thank you, you finally moved monochrome in the color tab !
- sliders are much easier to use, especially in the crop / resize / rotate. The additional 90° rotate is also a nice touch.
- the global tonemap feature, it is great. Will we get as many algorithm as Luminance to play with in the near future?
Nevertheless, some stuff bugged me :
-While I see the difference in visual results, it confuses me to have global tonemap and tonemapping as 2 different pluggin.
- Grouping seems like a good idea, but It confuses me more as it is not obvious weither groups are collapsed or not. Something like a folder icon with a thumbnail would be more straighforward or at least a "+" sign. "G" is not really helpfull in this case.
- the crop pluggin behavior is still weird (you still have to turn it off and on to modify the cropping window ). I got used to it by now anyway.
As a side note, will we get local contrast and conditional blending in v1.1?
In general, I am in awe before all the great work you have put into darktable. I cannot stop bringing it in when I am arguing about open source software quality.
Please, keep up the good work!
black squares? I heard that once before on the mailing list but that's something that shouldn't happen. Could you please file a bug in our tracker? Thanks!
Yes, both conditional blending and local contrast will be included - and should already be in your unstable installation since both got merged into the development branch months ago...
/Simon
And even though I love all the plugins, it is really hard to remember each plugin, its icon, what it does, and how it and other plugins together effect the image.
But I applaud the work effort and am increasingly using this tool instead of ASP.
The image quality produced by this app is outstanding :)
But then I discovered Aftershot Pro which is much faster than Darktable even using OpenCL on my Nvidia GT240. Why Aftershot is much faster? Is there any chance to speed up Darktable?
One of the things that I like of Aftershot is the highlight recovery, which I think does an excellent job.
Anyway, thanks for such a great tool. !
You can check this by running darktable from command line with
darktable -d opencl
It should print the status of its OpenCL detection.
You can check the processing time by running
"darktable -d perf"
Cheers,
Simon
[0] http://darktable.org/redmine/projects/darktable/issues
The classical way would be to grey out the preference option when the needed capability is not present, ie. no OpenCL is detected or could be loaded. I am currently thinking how this could be implemented in a more general way.
Either way, thanks for the hard work! I'm definitely keeping an eye on this project...
One question. I am using Debian stable (Squeeze) with libglib-dev version 2.24.
I am using Darktable 1.0.5 compiled from sources, but when I tried to compile git version I was getting error messages that I have to old libglib version.
My concern is if I will be able to compile new Darktable 1.1 on my system (Debian Squeeze) with Squeeze versions of libraries with no problems?
Thanks in advance for reply to that.
"
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/tmp/darktable/src/control/jobs/control_jobs.c: In function ‘dt_control_time_offset_job_run’:
/tmp/darktable/src/control/jobs/control_jobs.c:1389: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dt_image_add_time_offset’
"
"
48%] Building C object src/CMakeFiles/lib_darktable.dir/develop/imageop.c.o
/tmp/darktable/src/control/signal.c:69: error: ‘g_cclosure_marshal_generic’ undeclared here (not in a function)
[ 50%] Building C object src/CMakeFiles/lib_darktable.dir/develop/pixelpipe.c.o
"
No matter if I choose "reconstruct in LCh" or "cutoff highlights" (maybe badly translated from German) - I only have one slider "cutoff threshold", and nothing at all happens with any of the both options.
Debian Squeeze AMD64 + backports
Compiled from sources.
I'm very happy about darktable, hopefully one day it becomes mature enough to break Lightroom and enables me to switch to linux.
I think the most important is to work on the user interface, to make it more simple and the different plugins and options less confusing. Just keep it very simple and effective like Lr, with some features of Ps and fully customisable shortcuts an ui (with predefined sets) for the folks who come from Lr. That would be great. Keep up the good work and thank you!
thanks for your words!
However, just to make this clear: we will *never* copy any other products or change our processing/UI/whatever just because "they do it this way". We aim to provide a professional raw developer and asset management - and if we change something then because it disturbed *our* workflow and *we* had a better idea.
So: if you have special wishes, convince us! :)
Simon
thank you for all the hard work! I love the application and am really looking forward to the next release.
Do you have any plans of adding support for Ubuntu 12.10 soonish? As I read in several polls (though those are probably not too representative), many people already upgraded their OS to Quantal.
Erik
After a hiatus from digital photography I'm back in the game.
I found darktable in the Arch Linux repos.
Bit more of a learning curve than UFRAW, but I'm not going back.
Looking forward to 1.1
Believe you me, I will be showing off DarkTable's prowess whenever someone asks about the software I use (I always mention I use only open source software).
Now, about that file manager capability... (kidding! Awesome sense of humor!)
need it ! :-)
@smn Sure, just copying in order be like Lr wouldn't make sense, but to enable the user to set shortcuts as he wants (in my case, as I've used it with Lr, which of course would evolve once I get the freedom), does I think. As well as to clearly differentiate sections of the UI to make it more transparent and intuitive.
However I tried it only on mac yet, so not v1.1.
I tried 1.1, and I have to say respect, things are shaping up! And I've seen in the dev wiki you are working on the UI, awesome, keep up the good work!